Emilio Bonifacio, Yet Another Potential Utility Infielder

Here at Dodgers Digest, it seems like all we can write about lately is utility infielders (or prospects, which are way more exciting). Yet, it still remains the biggest hole on the roster and the only type of player that the front office is actively pursuing. Chad outlined quite a few options last week. The four internal options (Justin Sellers, Miguel Rojas, Dee Gordon, Brendan Harris) are not inspiring. Chone Figgins hasn’t been good in years, even if he might “actually try this time.” Most of the other external options are gone or awful. Yesterday, Mike made the case that Justin Turner is probably on his way. Turner isn’t terrible (he isn’t Michael Young or Yuniesky Betancourt), but he doesn’t completely solve the Dodgers’ infield depth problem.

A new name came up as a potential external option yesterday, when the Royals designated Emilio Bonifacio for assignment. Here’s how Bonifacio would fit into Chad’s table from last week:

  2013 statistics 2014 Projections (ZiPS)
Name wOBA Defense WAR wOBA Defense/600 PA WAR/600 PA
Emilio Bonifacio .279 0 Runs 0.6 .295 3 Runs 0.9 (Z)

He’s better than most of the other options on the list, but not by much. So, why would the Dodgers want a player that couldn’t stick on the Royals? Being DFA’d may not have been related to his performance alone:

Bonifacio is owed $3.5 Million next season, which is a lot for his skill set. Since the Royals just committed $4.25 Million to Bruce Chen (Bonifacio was DFAd to make room for Chen on the roster), Rany’s theory makes sense. With Spring Training quickly approaching, the Royals might also be looking to have a younger player in the utility infielder role.

Given the Dodgers’ deep pockets ($255 million payroll for next season, according to our payroll page), they could attempt to take all of Bonifacio’s salary in a straight waiver claim. However, the Dodgers are almost last in line in the waiver process (only ahead of the Pirates, Cardinals, and Braves). Given the Yankees’ (and other teams) need for infielders, it seems somewhat unlikely that he would make it to the Dodgers by waivers alone. A trade might be an option, and the Dodgers wouldn’t need to give up much if they take Bonifacio’s entire salary.

Bonifacio hasn’t really been a bench player before, so he’ll need to transition to the role. At this point in his career, he probably doesn’t have much of a choice. So, should the Dodgers bother with him over their other options?

Bonifacio’s biggest asset is his speed. For emphasis, here’s a video an inside-the-park home run he hit in 2009. Over the past three seasons, he’s stolen 98 bases and has been caught only 22 times. Adding value with his feet has never been an issue.

Bonifacio is a career .262/.322/.340 hitter (80 wRC+), which isn’t terrible. However, his hitting numbers are moving in the wrong direction. In 2011, Bonifacio had a career year for the Marlins, hitting .296/.360/.393 (109 wRC+), heavily aided by a .372 BABIP. Between thumb and knee injuries, he missed 98 games in 2012, posting a .258/.330/.316 (79 wRC+) while healthy. He was able to stay healthy during the 2013 season, but his offensive numbers slipped even further; he managed just .243/.295/.331 (71 wRC+) in 461 plate appearances. This trend isn’t exactly encouraging.

In order to judge Bonifacio as a potential utility option, we’ll need to look at his defensive statistics at each position:

Position Innings Career UZR/150
SS 754.2 -13.1
3B 1044.1 -6.5
2B 1297.2 -2.6
RF 189.0 10.4
CF 823.0 -7.8
LF 433.0 8.6

Overall, he’s a bit of a mixed bag. Unfortunately, he’s not a shortstop anymore (just 4 innings since 2011, poor stats before that), so that hurts his overall value. His defense at third is well below average, but not completely disastrous. Given the questions surrounding Alex Guerrero, it’s encouraging that Bonifacio can hold his own defensively at second base. The Dodgers don’t really need extra outfielders, but Bonifacio’s ability to play center field might be useful in a pinch.

It’s fairly easy to sum up Bonifacio’s value: he’s a better version of Dee Gordon. They’re both fast utility players who shouldn’t really be shortstops. Bonifacio’s defense at other positions is a known quantity, unlike Dee. Bonifacio’s also a light hitter, but he’s still much better than Dee has been able to show at the major league level thus far.

If Bonifacio’s presence means the Dodgers don’t have to start with Miguel Rojas, Chone Figgins, or Dee Gordon on the major league roster, then he’s probably a worthy addition. He wouldn’t be a huge upgrade, and he won’t put up a three win season like he did in 2011. He might not even be better than Justin Turner. But, he’ll likely provide more value than the current internal roster options, and that’s what matters.

This post uses the following statistics:

  • wOBA: Weighted on-base average, a statistic used to calculate overall offensive value by using unique weights for different types of hits. Explanation here
  • wRC+: Weighted Runs Created Plus. Compares a player’s offensive output to the league average position player, and is neutralized for park and league. 100 wRC+ is an average offensive player, 110 wRC+ is 10% above average, etc. Explanation here.
  • UZR/150: Ultimate Zone Rating per 150 games. Defensive statistic that uses manual inputs for each play from Baseball Info Solutions. Value is in runs above or below average. Explanation here
  • ZiPS: Systems used to project future player performance. Explanation here.


Daniel Brim grew up in the Los Angeles area and remains a Dodger fan despite currently residing in Salem, MA. As an engineer, he’s fascinated by the math and science behind the game of baseball, which probably explains a lot. He started “Blog To The Score” in late 2013 to dig deeper into the numbers behind the Dodgers. In its brief lifespan, it gained attention from local and national media. You can find him spending too much time in the comments section or on Twitter.


A closer look at Bonifacio's stats for last year reveals a different picture.  Yes, he hit .243 for the year. He didn't do very well at Toronto last year, hitting only .218, but when he came over to Kansas City, he actually hit much better than his career average of .262.  For the Royals he hit .285/.352/.348 and that's not bad.  Of course, we shouldn't expect him to hit as well in Dodger Stadium.  But even if he got close to his career numbers, that would probably be enough for what we need him for.  He's never going to be a power hitter but with Ethier (or your favorite outfielder) and probably Van Slyke, it won't be necessary.  Also, it really isn't true that he's never been a bench type.  He came up as such with Arizona and after a one year stint at 2nd Base for the Nats, he played all over the diamond for the Marlins and even Toronto (including 1 game at DH!)  I think too many people are asking all things from one guy.  He will be just part of a bench.  I see him as the super utility guy.  After Kemp gets back. (I don't see him starting the season after all's been said)  And after they don't need 13 pitchers (Probably near the same time) he would be on a bench with Fedex, Van Slyke, the rotating 4th outfielder and a super defensive glove guy (My money is on Miguel Rojas for that).  And that, my friends, would be a pretty solid bench.  Of course, if Rusney Castillo is the foreigner they are about to sign, and he can do the job, all bets may be off. But, if not, then Bonifacio would certainly be a better risk than Gordon.  And, hey, Gordon might be part of the trade back to the Royals as that cheap infielder!


SuperBowl should be on a saturday. 

Vote Nate 2016.

EephusBlue moderator

Poor Dustin. His top 10 list is going to get bumped within 5 minutes of being posted for coverage of Arroyo signing a 2 yr deal with the Dodgers.

M-P moderator

@EephusBlue  I actually am a bit concerned that Turner is going to sign, ha. But 1-10 is important so it'll stay up.

Purple Drank
Purple Drank

I am celebrating today by doing what I know best.

Multitasking the shit out of this invoicing project.


@Live. Breathe. Purple. Drank @Lobo I've been telling him off via email this morning.  The statement I posted below?  That was something he said.  I responded with this: so unless we can empathize with racists, we’re racist ourselves?